Home

News

Forums

Hardware

CPUs

Mainboards

Video

Guides

CPU Prices

Memory Prices

Shop



Sharky Extreme :

Biz Resources
Technology Asset Management Software
Information Technology Services
ecommerce solutions

Latest News


- Patriot Updates their DDR2 4GB PC2-8500 Line to "Revision 2"
- Mushkin Releases a New Line of Ascent Redline and XP eVCI-cooled Memory
- OCZ Hits 2.0 GHz using High-Density 2GB DDR3 Modules
- Dell Raises the Bar with Quad-CPU/Quad-Graphics XPS 730 H2 and H2C Gaming Systems
- Kingston Unleashes Low-Latency 800MHz HyperX FB-DIMMs for the Skulltrail
News Archives

Features

- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with Microsoft's Dan Odell
- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with ATI's Terry Makedon
- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with Seagate's Joni Clark
- Half-Life 2 Review
- DOOM 3 Review

Buyer's Guides

- March Extreme Gaming PC Buyer's Guide
- January High-end Gaming PC Buyer's Guide
- November Value Gaming PC Buyer's Guide

HARDWARE

  • CPUs

    - AMD Phenom X3 8750 Review
    - Intel Core 2 Duo E8500 Review
    - AMD Phenom X4 9850 Black Edition Review

  • Motherboards

    - AMD 780G Chipset Review

  • Video Cards

    - ASUS EN8800GT TOP 512MB Review
    - Gigabyte GeForce 8800 GT 512MB Review
    - PNY XLR8 GeForce 8800 GTS 512MB Review




  • Realizing that even their fairly robust PC-100 440BX platform would be running into system level bottlenecks that threatened to curtail their golden goose CPU's performance levels, Intel outlined several design goals when they put pen to paper concerning their next desktop platform.

    From the memory architecture to the I/O pathways, to the overall ability of the system to share its main memory with an AGP 4X video accelerator, the Camino platform was optimized to reduce the limitations that are encountered when transferring large amounts of data between the CPU, main memory, hard drive and video card.

    Intel outlines it this way when describing the needs of desktop PCs in the year 2000:

    Needs At Work

  • Internet and intranet connections that are central to productivity and interactions
  • Computing that follows their workflow, not their applications
  • Easier interaction with PC
  • Protect valuable data

    Needs At Home

  • Robust communications, education & entertainment via the Internet
  • Photorealistic games, content and rich commerce
  • Easier input, output and connectivity
  • Secure E-commerce every day

    To accomplish these goals, the i820 infrastructure is vastly different from the 440BX chipset, primarily in how it deals with each component in the food chain.

    First, thanks to an increased amount of maximum bandwidth potential via a jump for CPUs to a 133MHz front side bus speed along with the inclusion of 300 to 400MHz RDRAM, the i820 devotes dedicated bandwidth to certain peripherals.

    By doing this, the i820 provides superior bandwidth throughout the system while minimizing the potential for conflicts for resources. It also provides a much more capable multitasking environment for operating simultaneous transactions from different system devices than the previous 440BX platform is capable of.

    From this chart, which details the architecture of the i820 versus the 440BX, we can see where Intel concentrated their efforts towards eliminating bottlenecks and limiting factors to speedy performance.

    Through the i820's new MCH, or Memory Controller Hub, we see a coordinated improvement in each area that the system uses to communicate with itself, along with providing a smoother pathway for information to travel.





  • Copyright © 2002 INT Media Group, Incorporated. All Rights Reserved. About INT Media Group | Press Releases | Privacy Policy | Career Opportunities