Home

News

Forums

Hardware

CPUs

Mainboards

Video

Guides

CPU Prices

Memory Prices

Shop



Sharky Extreme :


Latest News


- Gateway Launches New Core i7-powered FX-Series Gaming PCs
- Asetek Liquid Cools the Intel Core i7
- Hercules Unveils the new XPS 2.150 Multimedia Speaker System
- MSI Adds an AMD Option to its Gaming Notebook Series
- Kingston Unleashes HyperX T1 Series Memory
News Archives

Features

- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with Microsoft's Dan Odell
- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with ATI's Terry Makedon
- SharkyExtreme.com: Interview with Seagate's Joni Clark
- Half-Life 2 Review
- DOOM 3 Review

Buyer's Guides

- November Value Gaming PC Buyer's Guide
- September Extreme Gaming PC Buyer's Guide
- July High-end Gaming PC Buyer's Guide

HARDWARE

  • CPUs

    - Intel Core i7-965 XE & Core i7-920 Review

  • Motherboards

    - Intel DX48BT2 (X48) Motherboard Review
    - AMD 790GX Chipset Review
    - Gigabyte GA-MA790FX-DS5 Motherboard Review
    - AMD 780G Chipset Review

  • Video Cards





  • Our de facto standard for OpenGL benchmarking once again officiates the battle between the most powerful video cards on the market. As always, we've tested under Normal, High Quality, and MAX settings in order to stress 16-bit, 32-bit, and geometric rendering capabilities. For our Normal Quality testing, the desktop resolution was set to 16-bit, and of course, v-sync was disabled in all of our testing. Also, keep in mind that we test Quake III with sound on as that is how the benchmark was actually designed to be run.

    I'd also like to mention that we've tried various methods of installing the drivers to enhance performance, as mentioned on the 3dfxgamers.com message boards. These techniques have no impact if you correctly install the card upon installation. If at all possible, stick to 3dfx's install utility.

    Testing under Quake III's Normal Quality settings, the Voodoo5 performs similarly to the Rage Fury MAXX at low resolution and places between the GeForce and GeForce2 at higher resolutions. We wouldn't expect the card to best the GeForce2 here due to its lower theoretical fill rate. In addition, bandwidth utilization is at a minimum so the card with the highest fillrate comes away with the victory.





    Copyright © 2002 INT Media Group, Incorporated. All Rights Reserved. About INT Media Group | Press Releases | Privacy Policy | Career Opportunities